AI tool consistency

Five AI tools. One brand voice. Finally.

Marketing directors pasting brand docs into every AI tool separately.

The problem

Why this is broken.

Each tool gets a slightly different paste. ChatGPT has the 2024 version. Claude has the trimmed-for-context version. Gemini has whatever someone grabbed last Tuesday.

Output is inconsistent across surfaces. Hours go into correcting tone, swapping banned words, fixing claims that drifted. The fix is the work now.

How Tonika solves it

The fix.

Include libraries
Voice + Tone
Positioning
Messaging
Audiences
Visual Identity
Product
Competitors
Claude SKILL.md
Starter
ChatGPT Instructions
Starter
Gemini Context
Starter
Portable Markdown
Any tool
18 records across 7 libraries

MCP-compatible tools pull live.

MCP-compatible tools pull your brand context directly from Tonika. No export step between you and consistent output.

Edit History ExportVersion 3
Voice + Tone
Brand Voice Rules
Direct. Diagnostic. Confident without padding.
Pushed to every export
v3
v3
v3
v3

Exports for everything else.

For tools without MCP support, structured exports in every format. The format each one needs.

Voice rules · enforced everywhere
  1. 1.Name the problem first.
  2. 2.Short declarative sentences.
  3. 3.Concrete over abstract.
  4. 4.No softening adverbs.
What we refuse
empowerunlockseamlessrobustcutting-edgeecosystemstakeholderleverage

Update once.

Update once. Every tool gets the latest version, whether it reads live or from an export.

One source · ships to whatever's next
Claude
ChatGPT
Gemini
Cursor
Markdown
Next tool
No lock-inYour canon comes with you

Vendor-neutral.

Today it's Claude. Tomorrow it's something else. The context survives the swap.

Recommended tier

Solo or Team.

$29 or $79/mo

Solo if you run AI tools solo. Team if multiple people are pasting into the same five tools.

Start structuring your brand context.

Join Waitlist